We are always searching for perfection, but never finding it. We invent theories of how perfection exists, just not here, not now. Perfection is an illusion.
For the Greek philosopher Plato perfection only existed in Forms and everything in the material world was merely an imperfect image of those Forms. Real perfection existed somewhere other than where we live.
For Christians perfection resides in God. God is perfect and all-knowing, all-loving, and all-powerful. If perfection is an illusion, what is God? Not an illusion, but not an unchanging image of perfection either.
The ACIM (A Course In Miracles) folks have an answer. The world is not real and it is only a dream.
[ACIM] states that everything involving time, space, and perception is as illusory. It presents a nondualism which states that God is the only truth and reality: perfect, unchanging, unchangeable, extending only love, though not in time and space, which can not really be comprehended from a dualistic perspective. –Wikipedia
“Dualism” or “duality” is a big no-no to many into this kind of philosophy. Perfection has to be unchanging (which in itself makes sense) so anything that changes is neither perfect, nor real.
I come to a different conclusion.
At some level the world exists and we live in it. A lot of how we perceive it is an illusion at some level too. We see solid objects but know from science that a lot we perceive is just empty space, occupied by tiny atoms, or particles, or something – possibly just waves or vibrations that feel solid.
To me the world is self-evident proof that absolute perfection is an illusion. God is not perfect and has never been so. That is not a bad thing.
The real God, of whom the Christian Apostle Paul said that “in him we live and move and have our being” (Acts 17:28) is not an absolute, finished, perfect being. That God is “becoming” that which it choses to be. God has goals, plans, and purpose in this existence, and you are part of that plan.
Supposedly God gave his name to Moses thus:
“I will be what I will be” (Exodus 3:14, alternative translation)
The above is the alternative translation in the NIV (New International Version) that usually goes along the static line of “I AM THAT I AM” that most are probably familiar with.
Author Joseph J. Dewey has argued that the most accurate translation would be:
I am becoming that which I choose to become (I AM BECOMING)
This takes into account, as does the alternative NIV version, that the underlying Hebrew verb is in the future, not present tense. If you think about it a bit, that kind of God or being is a lot more likely to sympathize with our problems than some absolute, perfect being beyond duality.
We too, like that God, are in a process of becoming something more. Maybe that is because we are part of that God? Think about it.
11/3/2015
A Course In Miracles (ACIM) seems to believe that which is not perfect is not real, or something like that. I would like to suggest another possibility. Nothing which is real is perfect. Nothing, not even God.
Perfection is an illusion, a belief about what something can be without any objective evidence to show that it is possible. It is an imaginary thing, much like medieval theologians arguing about how many angels could fit on the head of a pin.
So if God is not perfect, not all-powerful and all that stuff, then isn’t God limited? How is that?
liam
What is the problem with a limited God? Another way of saying it might be that on its level God is constrained and limited, but that level where God exists is so much higher than where we are it appears to be perfection to us – we can not imagine the difficulties God might face.
Also, if God took part in creation then once creation was a reality its physical laws were set in place such that not even God could change them from inside that creation. If God wants to partake in that existence, to be in it, then it must obey the laws of that universe.
lwk
I would have to agree with “relatively perfect’ and also that absolute perfection does not exist. Thanks for your comment!
lwk